In the current economic climate, decreasing cost and increase profit are the most important, and cost base is a major factor in managing a successful quarrying business, crusher replacement costs associated with cone crushers can be a major cost center. This post explains a method to reduce crusher replacement costs by casting crusher liners. However, the process has been perfected in recent years and can work well in the right applications. Cone crushers operate by having stone fed into the top of the crusher chamber. The chamber is lined with crusher replacement, namely the mantle and bowl liners. As the stone drops through the choked chamber, crushing is achieved when the motion of the mantle causes compressive and abrasive forces to act upon the stone and bowl liner, causing the stone to break. Liners are manufactured from manganese steel rather than normal steel as the manganese content provides protection against abrasion (normal steel generally has a lower tolerance to wear than crushing duties require). Depending on the stone being crushed, the percentage of manganese in the liners can vary from around 12% to 23%, so we can find the materials Mn14, Mn18, and Mn21. Below are the major factors we need analytics:
Liner selection
When selecting a crusher the bowl liner also varies in type:
- Coarse: wide inlet aperture
- Medium: medium inlet aperture
- Fine: small inlet aperture
Once again, selection depends upon the product required and the feedstock. Consultation with manufacturers is essential, some of whom will provide computer design facilities and offer wear-analysis services on both their own and other makes of crusher, such as the level of competition.
Crusher selection
Correct crushing chamber selection is crucial when installing a cone crusher. The reduction ratio, which in turn determines the product produced, depends on the chamber selected. In addition, the closed-side setting (the gap where maximum crushing is attained) affects both wear and the product produced. For example, if a standard unit is used instead of a short head, a reduction in fine product occurs, resulting in recirculation and, hence, more wear. The characteristics of the main types of the chamber are Standard: shallower angle than a shorthead with a longer crushing face. Suitable for larger feed sizes, generally +100mm, with a wide feed grading curve. Suitable for use as a secondary crusher but, if the smaller feed is introduced, can become susceptible to packing/blockages. Shorthead: steeper angle than a standard with a shorter crushing face. Suitable for smaller feed sizes, generally –100mm, with a short feed grading curve. Suitable for use as a tertiary crusher but will not accept large feed size owing to its smaller feed aperture.
Add protective surface
During material crushing in an impact crusher, wear is produced when the elements press against each other, such as liner, blow bars, and crushing material. During this process, small materials from each element become detached, causing the surface to wear away. The primary factor in wear for crushing applications is abrasion. Material fatigue is also a factor as the wear material is subjected to numerous pressure and impact stresses. There are several factors that influence the wear behavior of an impact crusher. The following are some of the factors that affect the wear lifetime of crusher blow bars:
Material-related factors:
- Abrasiveness
- Breakability
- Grain shape
- Fine-particle proportion
- Moisture content
- The proportion of unbreakable elements
Machine-process-related factors:
- Crushing ratio
- The ratio of the upper to the lower impact toggle
- Rotor speed
- Type of loading
- Screening mesh of the prescreen
- Contamination in the crushing chamber
Operation-related factors:
- Continuity of feed
- Correct adjustment of machine parameters
- Replacement of wear parts in due time
- Selection of the right blow bars
iners.